The TRINITY explained in 5 minutes! This is so good!

Amen ! I came to understand the Trinity as a Paradox 3 persons as God ? Yes Wayne Grudem’s Systematic Theology gives Us a simple chart : A full circle with three hyphenated S lines , making 3 equal sections but all being the essence of God. Father ,Son and Holy Spirit . He is Holy and deserves Our Praise , He Lives ;Trust Him! Amen.

If trinity is true, why Jesus never taught that

Thi is my betrothed account
In the beginning it was the frequency (holy spirit) the platform ( center of all things, balance, the scales if you will) and the creator floating throughout the void and the creator spoke for the first time and said 'i want to experience what i am feeling' so the frequency had to stop and upon the platform in which all things are made the creator and frequency collided and an expansion was formed and the creator said what shall we call it the frequency rolled her hand open and breathed the word Love. This is the true firmament and how it came to be. Love is simple and kind. Since ive been re-awakened i find my being aches how far man have fallen. They betray that which has created them and they hunt me aggressively. The same as when crucifixion became a fate it seems forgotten the sacrifice made the son carved out his cross the ones who entered into the holy covenant of marriage with the holy trinity violate that which is ironclad stab him with a dagger to fill the chalice to drink and absorb the power of God and the Gods. They were to do the same to me yesterday. In doing these atrocities to invest in fear is to worship a false God. Universal Law has been violated.
Let the sins be consumed by the worm or let him fall to be consumed by his sins

If thats true every person is God or what??? Stop that please

JESUS SAID HE THAT BELIEVE ON ME AS THE SCRIPTURES SAY RIVERS OF LIVING WATER WILL FLOW THRU HE TRINITY IS NOT IN THE SCRIPTURES SCRIPTURES SAY KEEP HOLY HOLY.

Trinity of God is like finding a three dollar bill which doesn't exist

Amen

You cannot pray like our Son who art in heaven hallowed be thy name.

Idolatry

Council of Nicaea 325 CE
The council was convened at the
behest of Emperor Constantine I to address the disputes within the Church of Alexandria between Arius and his followers on one side, and Alexander I and his followers on the other, concerning the nature of Jesus: was it the same nature as God, or the same nature as humanity?
Arius denied the eternity of Jesus, believing there was a time when Jesus did not exist. He considered Jesus to be exalted among God's creations and a creation of God, just as he considered the Holy Spirit to be a creation of God. Alexander I (Pope of Alexandria), however, affirmed that the nature of Christ was the same as the nature of God. Alexander's opinion prevailed by vote, and Arius and two priests refused to sign the resolution. Arius's books were burned, his doctrine became known as the Arian heresy, and his followers are still labeled as enemies of Christianity

Notice: Alexander's opinion prevailed by vote. So Trinity, which is not mentioned in the Bible, is a man made belief and if Arius’s opinion prevailed by vote there will be no Trinity in the world today.

Why the Trinity is totally unnecessary!

The prayer you shared presents a clear, consistent non-Trinitarian (specifically Oneness or strict monotheistic) theology. It repeatedly emphasizes that there is only one God — the Father — and frames Jesus and the Holy Spirit in ways that do not require three distinct, co-equal, co-eternal persons.Here’s why, according to the logic and scriptural emphasis of this prayer (and similar views), the Trinity becomes completely unnecessary:
1. The Prayer Insists on Absolute Monotheism
The text repeatedly returns to the core declaration:
* “the LORD is God, and that there is none else”
* “thou art the only true God”
* “Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD”
This is not vague language. It echoes the Shema (Deuteronomy 6:4) and countless Old Testament statements that God is singular. In this framework, introducing three distinct persons who are each “fully God” creates an unnecessary complication: it risks implying either three gods or a division within the one God that the Bible never describes.If God is truly one, and the Bible never says “God is three persons,” then the Trinity is an extra layer of explanation that is not required by the text itself.
2. Jesus Is Presented as the Manifestation of the One God, Not a Second Person
The prayer says:
* “Jesus Christ our Lord… taught us that thou art the only true God”
* “I and my father are one”
* Isaiah 9:6 is applied directly to Jesus: “The mighty God, The everlasting Father”
* “Through thy Word all things were created — Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his substance”
* “great is the mystery of godliness: who was manifest in the flesh”
This is classic Oneness language: Jesus is God manifest in flesh, not a second eternal person alongside the Father. The “Son” is the human nature/role that God took on, while the divine nature remains the one God (the Father). If Jesus is the visible image and full expression of the one invisible God (Colossians 1:15, 2:9; Hebrews 1:3), there is no need for a separate “second person” of the Godhead. The oneness is already explained by the idea of manifestation and incarnation.
3. The Holy Spirit Is God’s Own Spirit, Not a Third Distinct Person
The prayer states:
* “thy Holy Spirit, which proceedeth from thee”
* The Spirit “beareth witness with our spirit and guideth us into all truth”
* It is the same Spirit that “pricked our hearts unto salvation”
This treats the Holy Spirit as the Spirit of the one God (the Father), not as a separate person who is also fully God. In this view, saying the Spirit is a third person is unnecessary because the Bible frequently speaks of God’s Spirit as simply God Himself acting or present (e.g., “the Spirit of God,” “the Spirit of the Lord,” “My Spirit”).
4. The Baptismal Formula Does Not Require Three Persons
The prayer mentions baptism “in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.” Note the singular “name” (not “names”). In this interpretation, the one name is Jesus, because:
* Jesus is the full revelation of the Father
* Jesus is the one in whom the fullness of the Godhead dwells bodily
* The Spirit is given in Jesus’ name
Many who hold this view baptize “in the name of Jesus Christ” and see Matthew 28:19 as a description of the one God’s titles/roles rather than three separate persons. No Trinity is needed to explain the verse.
5. The “Mystery” Is God Manifest in Flesh — Not Three Persons
The prayer quotes 1 Timothy 3:16 (KJV):
“And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: who was manifest in the flesh…”
The mystery, according to this text, is God becoming flesh — not the existence of three eternal persons. The prayer calls the whole thing “thy mystery” and “secret and unrevealed wisdom,” then immediately points to the incarnation as the great revealed mystery. Once you accept that the one God appeared in human form as Jesus, the need for a Trinity to “explain” how God can be both transcendent and immanent disappears.
Why the Trinity Feels Unnecessary in This Framework
From the perspective of this prayer:
* The Bible never uses the word “Trinity” or explicitly says “three persons, one essence.”
* All the key relationships (Father-Son, God-Spirit, Jesus as God) can be explained through manifestation, incarnation, and roles within the one God.
* The Trinity was developed centuries later (Nicene Creed era) largely to combat certain heresies, but it introduces philosophical categories (person vs. substance) that are foreign to the biblical text.
* It creates problems the Bible doesn’t have (e.g., how can three distinct persons be one God without dividing the Godhead or creating subordination?).
In short: If you start with the prayer’s premises — one God, Jesus as the visible manifestation of that one God, and the Spirit as that same God’s presence and power — then three co-equal, co-eternal persons become an unnecessary theological construct. The oneness and the relationships are already accounted for without it.This is why groups that hold views similar to this prayer (Oneness Pentecostals, some Apostolic believers, certain unitarians, etc.) consider the Trinity not merely debatable, but extraneous to what the Scriptures actually teach.Would you like me to walk through specific verses the prayer references and show how both Trinitarian and non-Trinitarian readings handle them? Or compare this prayer’s view directly with the Nicene formulation?

God is not the Author of confusion.

So is the Holy Spirit a person or a force ?

The very belief that God is a Trinity is blasphemous. Jesus never taught that herecy. Why not listen to the teachings of Jesus and stop listening to men.
John 17:3 kjv:

"And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent." Why not believe Jesus?
The Father is Spirit and he is Holy. The Father is the only God-head who dwell in Christ. One True God. He begat a literal Son, Jesus, who was both human and devine.
Believing the words of Jesus Christ will give one eternai life, by not believing Jesus's explanation will disqualify one from eternal life.
Trinitarians and Sunworshippers, please take note!

Amen

Amen 🙏🏼

It's incredible that as humans we invented or interpreted something so illogical as the trinity instead of keeping it simple, GOD IS ONE.

Jesus didn't have the same attributes that the father... he wasn't all knowing.

The Trinity is pretty easy to disprove. Set aside the HUNDREDS of scriptural content that would prove it isn't true. Set aside the handful of scriptures that ( when taken out of context ) SEEM to show it is true. Set aside the HISTORICAL and archeological PROOF that triune " gods " were worshipped BEFORE the Bible's creation and just simply reason on THIS point.....follow THIS reason to its logical conclusion.... Ask yourself:" Did Jesus DIE to cover over the sins of mankind?" Any Christian would say:" Of course!" Then WHO raised Him back to life? The Trinity believer would say : " the Father did!" But I thought the father....the son...and the Holy spirit were all ONE! ( THE BASIS OF THE TRINITY ITSELF! ) If they are all ONE and The Fsther raised the son ( presumably with the help of the Holy spirit ) then that would mean that Christ DIDNT actually FULLY die for our sins! 2/3rds of Himself was still ALIVE! ( the father and Holy spirit ) which would mean...at BEST... Christ's death would only cover over 1/3rd of mankind's sin! 2/3rds of our sins would be UNCOVERED....making the ransom...null and void! For as the scriptures tell us...." the wages that sin pays is DEATH!" When I run these reasoning points by Trinity believers they simply teply...." Well, the Trinity is just a MYSTERY that NO human can fully understand!" THAT answer doesn't fly! The scriptures tell us:" ALL SCRIPTURE is inspired of God and meant for our TEACHING.....that we might have HOPE!" I lastly want to add that Im NOT a self righteous individual. This post is NOT meant to stir up debate, or arguments, or to say" LOOK HOW SMART I AM!" The things I posted were taught to me....I didnt come up with it. I only SHARE what I have learned to try and dispell untruth that has slowly infested " Christianity " since Jesus passed from this earth. ( As He promised WOULD happen after He died ) so....why does any of this MATTER? Because Satan's big plan is to draw people away from a close relationship with GOD....THE ONE TRUE GOD! Sure Satan would love to be worshipped HIMSELF.... but in the end He doesn't care WHO we worship as long ad it isn't the ONE TRUE GOD,JEHOVAH! If that means people worship a pagan infused IDEA of a triune " God head " which includes Jesus? He is fine with that. But...we all must remember TRUTH MATTERS! The Bible tells us:" Those that worship God MUST worship Him in spirit.....AND....TRUTH! I encourage ALL who read this post to do deeper research and REASON ( with heartfelt prayer ) on how we can draw closer to our Heavenly Father with TRUTH!! Another fun thing to reason on is the topic of " Heaven and a hot eternal burning Hell." If life in Heaven at Gods side was always God's original plan and DEATH is the ONLY gateway to be with God in Heaven....BUT....DEATH only came about because of the sin of ONE MAN..... Adam. Ask yourself.... where would Adam and Eve be RIGHT NOW, TODAY, IF THEY HAD NOT SINNED and passed sin off to their children, us? Something interesting to think about. Everyone have a blessed day....and keep SEARCHING for TRUTH!!

This is exactly the problem with Trinitarian teaching. It begins by declaring the Trinity to be the doctrine that makes Christianity Christianity, then it forces Scripture to serve that conclusion. But Jesus never said the Trinity is what makes Christianity true.

Jesus said:



“This is eternal life, that they may know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent.”



That is Christ’s own definition.

The Father is the only true God.

Jesus is the Christ sent by the Father.



That is not Trinity.



That is strict monotheistic Jewish-Christian faith.



The video says nature tells us what God is, but Scripture tells us who God is. Correct. And when Jesus tells us who God is, he points to the Father as the only true God.



So why does the video override Jesus with later theological language?



The speaker says Father, Son, and Spirit share the same will, mind, and nature.



Where did Jesus say that?

Where did Peter preach that?

Where did Paul write that?



Paul did not say, “For us there is one divine nature shared by three persons.”



Paul said:



“For us there is one God, the Father… and one Lord, Jesus Christ.”



That is the apostolic confession.



One God, the Father.



One Lord, Jesus the Messiah.



The video also says each person is fully God. But Scripture never says “three persons are fully God.” That is a theological formula, not apostolic preaching.



Peter preached Jesus as “a man attested by God” through works which God did through him.



Then Peter said God raised him and made him both Lord and Christ.



That is not co-equality.



That is appointment.



That is exaltation.



That is agency.



The Father sends.



Jesus is sent.



The Father commands.



Jesus obeys.



The Father gives authority.



Jesus receives authority.



The Father raises.



Jesus is raised.



The Father exalts.



Jesus is exalted.



That is not Trinity.



That is God acting through His chosen Messiah.



Then the video calls subordinationism a heresy, but the Bible itself teaches the Son’s subordination.



Jesus said the Father is greater than he is.



Jesus said he can do nothing from himself.



Jesus said he came not to do his own will, but the will of the One who sent him.



Jesus has a God.



Jesus prays to God.



Jesus worships God.



Jesus is seated at God’s right hand.



So calling subordination “heresy” is not defending Scripture. It is defending Nicene doctrine against Scripture.



The video says Jesus’ limitations only belong to his human nature. But this is the usual escape hatch.



When Jesus is ignorant, thirsty, obedient, sent, tempted, praying, receiving authority, or calling the Father “my God,” Trinitarians say, “That is his human nature.”



But when Jesus receives honor, authority, glory, or divine agency, they say, “That proves he is God.”



That is not exegesis.



That is a system protecting itself.



And then they say, “Do not get hung up. You cannot fully understand it. Just believe it.”



No.



That is not how Jesus taught.



Jesus did not hide eternal life behind an incomprehensible metaphysical formula.



He made it clear:



Know the Father, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom He sent.



The true sheep hear Christ’s voice.



Jesus said:



“They will hear my voice.”



Not the voice of Nicaea.



Not the voice of Athanasian Creed.



Not the voice of later Trinitarian categories.



The voice of Christ.



And Christ’s voice is clear:



The Father is the only true God.



Jesus is the one sent by Him.



There is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.



That is Christianity.



Not because a creed says so.



Because Jesus and the apostles said so.

The moment unitarians open their mouths to describe their unipersonal God, assigning to him fundamentally distinct traits like love, mercy, wisdom, and justice—they create a composite God. Love is not identical to justice, love gives mercy, while justice demands payment. Wisdom is not identical to raw power. These are completely different concepts. If God is a strict mathematical point of absolute singularity with zero internal distinction, then the moment you list his attributes, you have broken that simplicity and made him a collection of separate attribute parts. Unitarians allow plurality when it helps them describe God, but arbitrarily forbid it when it comes to his persons to attack the Trinity. That is a massive double standard. You can’t use a rule to attack trinitarians that completely destroys your own theology the moment you try to apply it consistently.
Ancient Jews revered God's personal name so deeply that they wouldn't even utter it aloud out of awe for his glorious transcendence. But as strict unipersonal monotheists, Jewish thinkers throughout history ran face first into the attribute problem. Great Jewish philosophers like Maimonides recognized the trap. They explicitly admitted that if God is an absolute, non composite numerical singularity, then human language breaks down. Maimonides argued that you cannot say 'God is wise' or 'God is powerful' because that adds properties to his essence. To protect their version of oneness, they had to resort to negative theology, arguing that you can only say what God is not, never what he is. To keep a unipersonal God 'purely one,' you are forced to strip him of any descriptive character. You can't even speak about him without accidentally inserting plurality.
​But worse than being unspeakable, a strictly unipersonal God could never have created the universe. To create means a creator brings something else into existence and enters into a relationship with it. But for an eternity past, before Genesis 1:1, the unitarian God sat in total, solitary isolation. He had no one to love, no one to commune with, with no one or anything to relate to. Relation is entirely foreign to His eternal essence. An isolated entity can't give what it doesn't have. If He lacked the capacity for relation eternally, he could never create a relational universe or create it at all because God could never create without entering into a relationship with it.
​Let's take this Unitarian theology to its absolute, final destination. Their entire case rests on a definition of 'oneness' that means absolute, isolated mathematical simplicity. They claim that if God has any internal plurality or relational distinctions, He is not God. But look at the staggering cost of that definition. Because an isolated being cannot give what it does not have, a strictly unitarian God lacks the power to relate to, or create, a universe.
​History proves this. When secular philosophers defined a unipersonal God this way, they had to admit that such a God could never choose to create anything, and they concluded the universe must be eternal.
​So look around you. The creation exists. You exist. I exist. The universe is a physical, undeniable reality. But by the Unitarian definition of oneness, God is fundamentally incapable of creating it. Therefore, if the Unitarian definition of God is true, the universe cannot exist. But since the universe does exist, the Unitarian version of God cannot. Creation itself stands as living, breathing proof that the unitarian definition of God is a mathematical fiction.

Enjoy, God bless.

1. God is Not the Author of Confusion

If God created the cosmos with order, reason, and laws, it makes no sense that He would make His own identity a confusing puzzle that requires human councils and philosophical jargon to decipher.



1 Corinthians 14:33 — "For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints."



The Trinity concept strips scripture of its plain meaning. When the Bible says God is one, it means exactly that—He is a single, absolute Supreme Being, not a complex committee or a single actor playing three roles.

The Creator of the entire universe does not need to play word games, hide behind philosophical masks, or obscure His identity from the very creation He wants to save. To claim that God must exist as a complex, three-in-one paradox—or that He shifts into different "roles" and "masks" to show His oneness—is to limit His absolute power. It suggests He is incapable of being understood plainly.



The scriptures do not require mental gymnastics; they demand a straightforward reading of a sovereign God.

Amen

If you don't believe JESUS IS not the SON OF GOD you are lost my friend.
Charles Ismail from south africa western cape