The French and Indian War: This Is How the ORIGINAL “World War” Started
Video Overview & Insights
Join the Captivating History Book Club: https://bit.ly/3TMmpU2
every one who likes this comment has a GYATT!
Get a FREE mythology bundle ebook covering Greek, Norse, and Egyptian mythology here:
http://www.captivatinghistory.com/ebook
You can get the audiobook version of The French and Indian War here:
https://www.amazon.com/French-Indian-War-Captivating-American/dp/B0BHFF8QC2
You can get the paperback version of The French and Indian War here:
https://www.amazon.com/French-Indian-War-Captivating-American/dp/1637165811
thank you🤣
And the ebook version of The French and Indian War here:
https://www.amazon.com/French-Indian-War-Captivating-American-ebook/dp/B09SDGP5RV
This helped alot thank you!
Most people have heard about the French and Indian War, but you will find that most history classes have “forgotten” to explore some of the most interesting and important facets of this conflict. Its little-told stories and often underrated importance in world history have begun to be buried over the centuries. Was this epic struggle simply another war among many others in history?
Many of the incredible details, stories of legendary heroism, and actual world-changing events have not been given their moment to shine. The French and Indian War was not only about armed battles. It was also an extraordinary story of two empires with long-standing grudges that spilled over into the New World. This clash of titan-like powers shaped the fates of millions of people, numerous tribes, and multiple nations.
George Washington was a scammer from the beginning.
See all captivating history books here:
https://www.amazon.com/author/captivatinghistory
Very interesting period and conflict. A book just published, titled "Aukewingeketawso", including reproduced period documents, summarizes the French Indian War era with special focus on a man named Charles Langlade (1729 - 1800), who initially led Native American warriors, Canadians and French against the British between 1752-60 before afterwards swearing allegiance to British after the French were defeated and later aided the former in their (failed) efforts in American Revolution against the United States. A very interesting read.
Follow us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/captivatinghistory
Follow us on Twitter: @CaptivHistory
Résidus d'anglais normal
More User Perspectives
C'est pour sa que sa suce entre American la GRAND BRETAGNE 😂
@thomaspayen2720Do you mean Indians from India? That theater was part of wider Seven Year War. However, indigenous people in North America certainly fought in the French and Indian war
@Cacaofarmer63Horribly done. Double barrel shotgun, Apache Indians, Sharps rifles and civil war soldiers. Why so many pictures and talk of Indians if the “French and Indian war didn’t involve actual Indians???!” 😮😅😢
@skooter2767kYou forgot to mention that, after the French took fort Necessity, Washington signed a surrendering document admitting that he was responsible for the murder of Jumonville. Later he would say that he did not understand what he signed because he did not speak nor read French.
@jean-louislalonde6070Didn’t involve Indians?!!! SMH
@september2651Joe Biden had nothing on Washington when it came to graft and corruption. After the Revolution Washington stole $ Millions in land deals.
@billballbuster7186I've used a lot of these videos to teach my 8th graders...good stuff. But this video is full anachronistic pictures: plains Indians, double barrel shotgun. C'mon...you can do better with this important period of history.
@Tomas-to9kzYes it did involve Indians. They fought in both sides in fact and were a significant part of the conflict. She zzz please.🙄
@brealistic3542Fighting over land that doesn't belong to either of them. We were already here
@No1SpLWhat - the French and Indian War "did not involve actual Indians"? So, what were all those Indigenous allies of both the French and British doing; sitting on the sidelines watching all the battles? Might want to do a little research on the involvement of the "Indians".
The British were not so interested in "spreading their armies" westward into the continent. In fact the British had never had any standing armies in their North American colonies. They called relied on colonial militias and as conflicts arose sent troops to America. This is what happened during the French and Indian War/Seven Years War. After the war was over, British policy changed and it did keep troops in America.
Despite what you've been led to believe. Washington was inept as a soldier and commander. Young and overly ambitious his main goal was to impress the English into giving him a commission. Which they denied to him because of his poor display of judgement, less than honest reporting of incidents. He'd already been at Braddock's defeat.
During the Revolution Washington was 2 and 6 in his battles.
I hate Dis
@Lovin.444KaiLol I think the double barrel shotgun photo was a little out of place
@goodoleme747Great videos! Love this channel
@robertlandpodcastYou should make a video about drugs in America
@moterps1737UP for succession !
@brodyhess5553Could u please make a video about sexual revolution during 60s in USA. And how did the attitude of American towards s.x changed?
@whatsup3519First
@dylan0003