The Biggest Misconception in Physics
Video Overview & Insights
Why does energy disappear in General Relativity? 👉 Use code VERITASIUM to get 50% off your first monthly KiwiCo Crate! https://www.kiwico.com/VERITASIUM
👉 Use code VERITASIUM to get 50% off your first monthly KiwiCo Crate! https://www.kiwico.com/VERITASIUM
Try Snatoms! A molecular modelling kit I invented where the atoms snap together.
https://ve42.co/SnatomsV
So....there are no concrete 'laws of physics" just theories. Got it
Sign up to the Veritasium newsletter for weekly science updates - https://ve42.co/Newsletter
▀▀▀
God is laughing at how little we know and how full of ourselves we are about it.
A huge thank you to Prof. Geraint Lewis, Prof. Melissa Franklin, Prof. David Kaiser, Elba Alonso-Monsalve, Richard Behiel, Prof. Leo Stein and Jakob Schwintenberg for their invaluable expertise and contributions to this video.
Special thanks to Alessandro from ScienceClic for his help on animations and input on the script. Check out his excellent video on Noether’s theorem here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hF_uHfSoOGA
Fabulous
▀▀▀
0:00 What is symmetry?
The Rocks energy was lost when he recorded Scorpion King. 🫳🎤
4:25 Emmy Noether and Einstein
7:33 General Covariance
Hey! Can u make a video on Edward teller, jt would be amazing and veritasium works out
11:59 The Principle of Least Action
15:29 Noether’s First Theorem
and I'm still watching this without skipping even though I have no idea what they are talking about
18:24 The Continuity Equation
23:20 Escape from Germany
Damn I missed this one. Can't believe it's a year old
24:49 The Standard Model - Higgs and Quarks
▀▀▀
So does this mean that the voyager 1 and 2 will stop one day? Thats crazy
References:
MathHistory Biography - Emmy Amalie Noether via mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk - https://ve42.co/BioNoether
The more I watch these videos the more I get convinced that even the brightest of humanity is in a very bad form in terms of general intelligence. They spend lifetime effort to figure out stuff that takes milliseconds to process ... a note for AI...
Bartlett, J. G. (2021). The Standard Cosmological Model and CMB Anisotropies. New Astron.Rev. 43 (1999) 83-109 - https://ve42.co/CosmoCMB
Kimberling, C. (1982). Emmy Noether, Greatest Woman Mathematician. Mathematics Teacher, March 1982, Volume 84, Number 3, pp. 246–249. - https://ve42.co/NoetherGreat
This makes me feel like the Nobel Prize being only awarded to living people was by design to outrun living memory of people whose work was ignored or stolen.
Blunck, A., et al. (2016). Mathematik und Gender. Verlag Franzbecker - https://ve42.co/MathGender
Evans, R. J. (1976). The Feminist movement in Germany, 1894-1933. Sage Publications - https://ve42.co/FeministGer
Without Emmy Noether, there would be a huge gap in mathematics and its understanding via www.mpg.de - https://ve42.co/NoetherGap
Dihedral group of order 6 via Wikipedia - https://ve42.co/Dihedral6
Great video, but Imagine how awesome it would have been.if Emily Noether would have been part of Michelson-Morley experiment
Emmy Noether University of Erlangen via Wikipedia - https://ve42.co/Erlangen
Timeline of women in mathematics via Wikipedia - https://ve42.co/WomenMath
Idk....seems kind of culty to me...like the gender cult.
Elizaveta Litvinova via Wikipedia - https://ve42.co/LitvinovaE
Sofya Kovalevskaya via Wikipedia - https://ve42.co/KovalevskayaS
Every Thing is conserved... do what you want... we can only discover... discover... and discover...
Charlotte Scott via Wikipedia - https://ve42.co/ScottC
Cornelia Fabri via Wikipedia - https://ve42.co/FabriC
I don't believe at this theory ! That energy disappear!
If it does it must recreate in one way or another ! And in somewhere! If this theory is correct the universe will dissapear in the form we know today !
I believe that a oart can be conserved and a part cannot ! But it certainly doesn't disappear!but ut certainly is , will be somewhere and when we talk about energy conservation it is always referred to a clised or limited system taken into consideration!
Emmy Noether, the renowned mathematician who taught 20 years of unpaid classes just because she was a woman via english.elpais.com - https://ve42.co/NoetherPay
Noether, E. (1908). Über die Bildung des Formensystems der ternären biquadratischen Form. Reimer - https://ve42.co/NDissert
So this is how I understand it (correct me) since the universe is expanding and accelerating, when you throw the rock it will stop because relative to us it is now the same speed as the expansion because it accelerated by same speed the rock initially started with?
Noether, E. (1983). Invariante Variationsprobleme. Gott.Nachr.1918:235-257,1918; Transp.Theory Statist.Phys.1:186-207,1971 - https://ve42.co/InvarProb
Noether, E. (2018). M. A. Tavel’s English translation of “Invariante Variationsprobleme”. arXiv - https://ve42.co/InvarProbEn
If you zoom out far enough for time dilation to matter, wouldn’t the constant become energy/volume?
Byers, N. (1998). E. Noether’s Discovery of the Deep Connection Between Symmetries and Conservation Laws*. Mod.Phys.Lett. A14 (1999) 99-104 - https://ve42.co/SymCon
De Haro, S. (2021). Noether’s Theorems and Energy in General Relativity. Cambridge University Press, 2021 - https://ve42.co/EnergyGR
Energy is conserved through transfer.
Rowe, D. E. (2019). Emmy Noether on Energy Conservation in General Relativity. arXiv - https://ve42.co/EnergyCon
Branding, K. (2005). A Note on General Relativity, Energy Conservation, and Noether’s Theorems. Springer - https://ve42.co/GRanEC
It is so sad that my country (germany) lost so many great minds due to stupid people having brought the Nazis to power.
Additional References:
https://ve42.co/NoethersAdRefs
I do not agree with this. The local motion of a freely moving object remains unaffected by cosmological expansion. Expansion influences only the large-scale geometry and the causal connection between widely separated regions. The stone does not stop.
▀▀▀
Special thanks to our Patreon supporters:
so basically our theories can't account for the variances in the universe.
Adam Foreman, Albert Wenger, Alex Porter, Alexander Tamas, Anton Ragin, Autodidactic Studios, Balkrishna Heroor, Bertrand Serlet, Blake Byers, Bruce, Dave Kircher, David Johnston, David Tseng, Evgeny Skvortsov, Garrett Mueller, Gnare, gpoly, Greg Scopel, iRick, Jon Jamison, Juan Benet, Keith England, KeyWestr, Kyi, Lee Redden, Marinus Kuivenhoven, Matthias Wrobel, Meekay, meg noah, Michael Krugman, Orlando Bassotto, Paul Peijzel, Richard Sundvall, Sam Lutfi, TTST, Tj Steyn, Ubiquity Ventures, wolfee
▀▀▀
Nope, not the best Thumbnail. Not at all.
Directed by Matthew Davies
Written by Matthew Davies, Casper Mebius, Derek Muller and Pablo Rovetto
So nobody has anything to say about the thumbnail?
Edited by Trenton Oliver, Peter Nelson and Nick Lear
Animated by Fabio Albertelli, Emma Wright, Andrew Neet, Alessandro Roussel and Ivy Tello
Vertassium, can something like wind or fire destroy electricity?
Illustrations by Jakub Misiek, Cainejan Esperanza, Tommy Stevens, Maria Gusakovich and Emma Wright
Additional research by Henry van Dyck, Gabe Strong and Darius Garewal
3:40 couldn't this be extended by flipping the triangle in the third dimension on the axis of the mirrors to the previous? As far as I know a two-dimensional a shape cannot have perceivable two sides like a coin does have heads and tails for us. It's impossible because they'd must occupy the same space in the depth axis in order to be in the same slice of the 2nd dimension, so they would be indistinguishable to a 2-dimensional being.
Or is it [insert vsauce intro] just a generalization for the object to be oriented in the lowest dimension it can be described in? If so, what would happen if you tried to find the symmetria of fractals inside fractal planes, the non-integer dimensions?
Produced by Matthew Davies, Casper Mebius, Derek Muller, Zoe Heron, Rob Beasley Spence and Tori Brittain
Thumbnail contributions by Jakub Misiek, Ren Hurley, Ben Powell and Peter Sheppard
I consider myself to be a theoretical physicist. I’ve discovered a direct correlation to the speed and mass of a rock and the amount of pain and bruising it causes.
Additional video/photos supplied by Getty Images and Pond5
Music from Epidemic Sound
This is an excellent explanation., I know this stuff, but you bring it all together, Thanks
More User Perspectives
Lets do some fun:
We have point A and point B in space, and we can Through ball from both points in same direction or different. Through two ball in large constant space between A and B with constant velocity, check the point where velocity mismatched or ball really stops! Find the relations!
Aether is also another explanation of why things stop
@arkad4279Newton's laws says it will continue until a force acts upon it , and seeing as gravity permeates space , objects will either slow down or speed up basic physics
@escobarlisle6007Suddenly the concept of ∫f(x)+C makes sense.
I would like to know more about her approach to mathematics.
I remember realizing that energy was not conserved, intuitively you can have the birth of items which create more energy.
@LydellAaronNoether was great😮😮😮
@GodsFolk-o3mWhere does conservation of mass come from?
@GodsFolk-o3mThings further away from you relate to you less than what's near you, and how things relate to you experience a derived observation of you (😬😬)
@TomannaVibration
@TerenceBass-x3fSpin
@TerenceBass-x3fReposition word
@TerenceBass-x3fGod
@TerenceBass-x3fThe golden age of cosmic physics is unfortunately over.
@philosophyyyyCrank show... sorry energy is conserved.. btw, the vaccuum is a medium and has an energy density etc..
@TheJackelanternSo one day everything thats not in orbit will stop in space?
@FisjI bet Noether was LSD tripping. No one could possibly come up anything like this… ”Hey Einstein! You are wrong. Look at the symmetries. There aren’t any that means energy is leaking through the cracks to other dimension.”
@Krapula018It would be nice if you learned how to pronounce "another" 👍
@wiecek00if you lose energy in the "cracks" of the bending spacetime, then with certainty if you were at those specific places you'd see the same thing. It does not disappear if you narrow into it. The same way relativity is huge near black holes and neutron stars etc, but imperceptible here on earth ... but it's not 0. This energy drain should be measurable if it's a reality.
@bigdogboos1I guess you just missunderstand previously...
@GafletDalaletHattaHiyanettelerNot sure if this was addressed, but in accounting for gravitational potential energy, the net energy of the Universe can be zero.
@slackerman9758OK I know its only 18 minutes in, pero, I have to wonder if it is not energy but time that is not conserved as the universe is expanding our point of reference seems to see that the object accelerates when it is the light that is slowing down as time from its point of reference far in the future compaired to our referance point slowes down. If energy is conserved and we are currently on the expansion slope of the universe then it would appear to us if everything is moving away and in the dark cold late history of everything it would appear as if everything is shrinking and time is the culprit again the motion is consistent the energy is consistent its time that is variable and our perspective of everything else lenses it to seem that motion is accelerating or decelerating everything away from us.
@hopetulovemi3:34 and what about the symmetry mirror at the borders? They even move the object :) .
@philipberger9452