Rorschach: Psychology’s Most Controversial Test

Erinnere mich an eine Filmszene, in der ein Gefängnispsychologe einem Häftling Klcksbilder vorlegt. "Was sehen Sie?" Antwort: . "Kleine rosa Wölkchen." Da steht noch ein Wachmann dabei. Dieser geht weg. Psychologe stellt die selbe Frage. DerHäftling: "Ich sehe Blut!" Er erwürgt den Psychcologen, zieht desen weißen Kittel über und kann damit fliehen.🤑

First one looked like 2 kneeling garden gnomes hi-5 went wrong like they tried to kneel but maybe the impact was too fast and they busted their knees.

2nd one kinda looked like twins leaning against Judy hoops shoulders.

3rd image kinda looks like an under the sea themed image, u get seahorses, blue jellyfish, maybe yellow and orange corals, and u get 2 shrimp doing underwater acrobatics. Above the seahorses

Not what you see, but what you think it could be.

The intro of this video explains RORSARCH PSYCHOLOGY involving 10 inkblots. These images are presented to a patient to describe what they see.

Our intelligence agency had abused their surveillance and communications to perform very racist and manipulative operations and studies that took advantage of my parents in 1984.
This misconduct took place overseas before the Internet was created. It involved psyche professionals who focused their analysis of my classroom behavior at the age of 6 years old.
My father a Filipino man in the military who married my mother, a black woman. They would each wear a tiny inner ear remote communicator in which my parents would receive and be guided very specific remote instructions.

After questionable activity was coordinated within the elementary classroom. Manipulating personnel would influence both the school and parents to have me tutored at home.
This was Instigated by having another child follow the agency's remote communications which would provoke a response from me.
( INSTEAD OF QUESTIONING THE ACTIVITY BY THIS AGENCY. A LACK OF OVERSIGHT AND TRANSPARENCY ALLOWED INTERNAL MISCONDUCT TO COORDINATE VERY QUESTIONABLE ACTIVITIES ON CLARK AIRFORCE BASE PHILIPPINES IN 1984.
Questionable activity involved:

* Communications to first time parents and Wurstsmith Elementary to have a 6 year old child removed and tutored at home.

* Communications to the first time father to place his child in a scouted location outside the military base.
( Abandoned child who would be left in a room with a strange man who exposed his penis. U.S intelligence took no immediate action for a 6 year old child. The only action that took place would plan medical malpractice for homicidal results and suspect that child of having an incestous attraction to the father who had received instructions to abandon his child by a black woman.
Suspect that same child of possible predatorial behavior at the age of 6 years old

* Inter-agency requests and instructions to locate a mistress for a married man. Request to locate a younger blonde woman.

* Carefully worded narratives that would be remotely conveyed to the Filipino military man to repeat to his black wife:

" THATS NOT MY KID, THATS YOUR CHILD" - u.s Intel

* Guidance to the military man to park his black wife and child in front of the FEED STORE.
( store that sold food for livestock animals)

* Continued Communications to the first time father to have the child he had abandoned overseas to also see the new military office in Conroe Texas.
( initial assessments to determine what their 6 year old victim notices and recalls)

Damage Control Efforts/ avoidance strategies to divert attention from its own misconduct and inappropriate activity that was being conducted on Clark Airforce Base Philippines and the Elementary School.

* Support and Planning of a marital affair for a married man. Requests and to track a young blonde female for the federal intelligence ( a unit whose internal biases was unrecognized by a lack of oversight and internal auditing or no internal auditing committee to prevent misconduct or abuses of surveillance intelligence equipment or investigations.

* Harassment agency stalking labeled when the intelligence agency located a stranger to physically assault a 14 year old child on John H Wood Middle School in 1990.

* Directions Communications to a youth minister to flatulate in the face of the 14 year old victim who the agency had communicated and directed others to abandon and plan medical malpractice overseas in 1984.

* The agency had been familiar of this abuse and misconduct that it had provided additional resources and support to its personnel who recently used cyber security app developers to make racist remarks online.
( CYBER PERSONNEL WOULD THEN FORM ONLINE PLATFORMS TO MAKE MALICIOUS N***G*R slurs to display their ability to willfully discriminate without accountability.
Display of superiority and it's ability to avoid responsibility for its racist behavior.

* The agency displays it's ability to display and abuse it's power by willfully discriminating by allowing both psyche and medical professionals to apply malpracticing tactics on those they have taken advantage and manipulated since 1984.

( Avoidance strategies involves accessing covert surveillances and communications to eavesdrop and monitor to conduct secret assessments of logic and routine behaviors/ list personality types. Using its communications to position certain individuals and groups to carry out specific directions and repeat carefully worded narratives in close to those they have abused between the years of 1984-2019.

The agency performs a familiar tactic that had patronized military personnel Michael Quijano who was married to a black woman.
The agency would communicate to this man and expose certain insecurities and then locate a younger blonde female for him to meet.
While coordinating this marital affair they would access the device the black wife was wearing and present a false impression that they advocate and supported her and her family.
This false impression kept her from suspecting that U.S intelligence was involved in the attempted homicide of her child and the planning of her husband's marital affair to another woman that was also selected by the same agency who recently referred to the victim, now a black crossdresser as a Schizophrenic N***G*R

the agency puts forth various efforts and strategic activity that is RORSARCH INSPIRED. This means that activity is coordinated to be presented for a person to notice and form assumptions or ideas.

Through this activity the agency maintains a covert superior advantage by secretly listening or watching a person respond, react or expose intentions without AGENCY PERSONNEL BEING RECOGNIZED.
This creates opportunity to avoid accountability through evasive tactics. Without physical confrontation and use of covert communications the agency would stags public situations activity to impact the behavior logic and emotions of a person while exposing their victims actions, intentions and behavior.

** Operations Surveillances involved in the marriage of a Filipino man in the military originally focused it's surveillances on a 6 year old child. During this time no immediate action or concern took place overseas. Instead United States had provided additional support and personnel who received fulfilled requests for questionable intelligence staff/ psyche personnel who referred to those they consider inferior as n**g*rs.

Staff involved in this misconduct focuses on exploiting sexuality, premisciuty and various forms of personal addictions that is then used as bait.
By recognizing these addictions it will then perpetuate the behavior as criminal predatorial due to conservative biases

** LGBT HOMOSEXUAL/ SEXUALITY IS PERVERTED AND USED TO INFLICT PARANOIA OR HAVE THE VICTIM APPEAR CRIMINAL OR THREATENING BY EXPOSING OR BY MAKING SUBTLE SUGGESTIVE REFERENCES THROUGH VARIOUS FORMS EVASIVE STRATEGIES.

* evasive strategies involved communicating through its intelligence community in media, cyber and public.
Those individuals would be coordinated to perform activity in close proximity so that the victim either notices it or is overwhelmed.
The intent is to cherry pick personal information that is useful inflict paranoia or humiliation.
** Gagging an individual through evasive tactics requires this agency or unit to Eavesdrop wiretap hack and review the information it gathered or selected to determine what pieces of information would be useful in humiliating paranoing the victim.
Cyber intelligence investigations has shown internal racism and attempted homicide and a lack of oversight.

A complete failure of system protections that uses those they have abused as guinea pig to forms inhumane psychology.
A history of medical malpractice and Psychiatrics that theorized medical malpractice by attempting castration of a 6 year old child that the agency can avoid accountability by having their witness victim self destruct or suicidal during puberty.

** The agency uses this method by applying this approach through their use of cyber personnel.
FBI law enforcement whose suspects or use of narcotics is associated to that objective of influencing self destructive behavior ( medical malpractice)

ATTEMPTED HOMICIDE without Physical confrontation.

The Operation or project would a victim appear that the criminal intent is assumptive. Since the activity is only coordinated in close proximity and not direct. It gives the appearance of unaffiliated activity of tasks. In fact, the agency does this legal scapegoating to protect law enforcement from liability but with the intent to do both mental emotional harm.

* It requires a form of harassment which is not coincidental.
** It requires consistent personnel to maintain involvement

Therefore it's still controlled by those who are involved in the attempted homicide of a 6 year old black child who they had a first time father abandon in a foreign country.

It is also associated to the physical assault of that same individual on the campus of Wurstsmith Elementary.

It also displays no oversight and internal enforcement of zero tolerance for workplace discrimination.

A lack of internal enforcement of zero tolerance for discrimination exposes training issues.

Training issues that associated to those who facilitate questionable activity and operations.

Zero Tolerance Discrimination is National Policy for any Law Enforcing Agency.

Federal intelligence since 1984 has used their massive community to manipulate and abuse me and First time parents in 1984. The physicians and psychiatrics employed with this intelligence agency cased me at the age of 6 years old on WEISTMEISTER ELEMENTARY Clark Airforce Base Philippines.
They then removed me from the school to observe my sexual response to an older man in a much less regulated environment in 1984.

Today that same agency applies parts of this psychological test to confuse manipulate and traumatize me after their first attack overseas. In 2019 they started a new 2nd project to also intimidate shock confuse and manipulate me by presenting various situations and activity online and in public in a collaborative effort to effectively traumatize Traumatize me mentally and emotionally.

I WAS ACTUALLY REFERRED TO AS N***G*R. DURING THE COURSE OF THE PSYCHOLOGICAL INDUCING OPERATION.

This video was good but too long. You don’t need an ink lot to tell whether someone’s a schizophrenic etc

1980's before establishing the internet federal intelligence used my parents influence and gain insight into my behavior and logic while navy stationed us on Clark Airforce Base. During the 1980's federal intelligence abused their behavior surveillance and research that placed me in neglectful situations. At the age of 6-7 years my sexuality was exploited by having other adults taunt whether I like boys or girls. Then placed alone with a strange man that raised suspicion that I had a incestuous attraction towards my father. Returning to the U.S federal intelligence prepared an affair for my father. When the affair happened they informed my mother to catch the affair. U.S Intelligence who influenced my parents divorce also involved my father's family to defile my child development and adolescence. Governmental Intelligence continue to stage and situations and scenarios for me to experience before establishing the internet. Today federal intelligence continues to manipulate provoke and form various ways to overwhelm and trigger thought, assumptions through given other remote secret communication which helps federal intelligence determine what I will think assume through the specific tasks given to others.

Inspired Rorschach test: these situations are arranged to bait lure and observe the logic & behaviors of those they have researched. This is a way pin-point behavior and understand a person's thinking processes. Plus make corrections in their behavior U.S intelligence find concerning.

Funny, would it be nice to report the actions and objectives of federal intelligence & government operation we as the public also find concerning?

Example: Authentic websites/ locations to report suspicious intelligence activity that abuse their surveillance investigation research powers. This report is reviewed by executive unbiased agencies unaffiliated to current projects and operations. They report is received and reviewed and specific inspectors/ Supervisors/ Oversight committee determines the wrong-doing and terminate intelligence that is involved in the abuse of their position.

-Example: We have investigated your complaint and found disturbing use of agency resources and powers. Our agency prides itself for conducting operations and programs that are in-line with the protecting the health well-being of the public. These actions we discovered do not represent our relationship with Law Enforcement agencies or the intelligence community. This issue have been resolved and any abuse of intelligence resources and the safety of vulnerable populations is our priority.

The real test might be how the examiner interprets the patient's interpretation.
;-) = (winking happy face)

Psychologist:
"What do you see?"

Me:
"It looks like ink folded onto paper"

Psychologist:
"Well, no, do you see a butterfly a dog, a cloud?"

Me:
"NO. I see a piece of paper with ink thats been folded"

Psychologist:
"I believe you have some serious issues"

Me:
"Hey, I'm not the one who thinks ink folded onto paper is a butterfly or cloud"

Psychologist:
Lays on the couch

All the people who study psychology all seem to have mental issues themselves. So who truly is the crazy one?

0:58 was not expecting him to look like Brad Pitt…

1. Two really cute little fairy tail animals high diving each other.
2. That is a bat… or more likely a moth.
3. Underwater- pink sea horses and blue crabs and other aquatic animals.

Voodoo

Who are you trying to shock? Not life with 10 photos in jail. How many emojis and bitcoins? Power of prayer. Just a bunch of visual analogue and wait for the dolphin to bark out the answer. Too many bombs. What sonar? Get your omega 3's, fishing license and be safe.

I think another thing to consider is which time are you living. I just tried to interpret ink blots and some of them look like weird guitars or maybe alien flying saucer; things/ideas that didn't exist back then.

i had one done literally in 2021 lmfao

Proof that psychology and psychiatry are bald-faced pseudo-science. It is absurd they have so much power.

Projective tests are all trash. and the theory of Rorschach is BS. BS in / BS out.

As she said I think the Rorschach and similar test have value when used appropriately. There never was an intent to diagnose personality disorders this way. The ink blots are called a projective test meaning you associate the inkblots with what is in your mind. If someone had just lost their mom for example and I pull out a pic of a pregnant woman or someone carrying a baby that is likely going to lead into someone talking about their mom. --This sort of relates to a similar projective test called the thematic apperception test (TAT) where the patient looks at a picture and are asked to tell a story

I've looked at clouds/ink blots from both sides now.

👺🤠

When your Captain Marvel movie flops you end up narrating this video.

So to generalize... Expanding the use of something beyond its intended purpose, sometimes is a good thing, sometimes a bad thing. But to make claims one must apply (what we now have as) scientific methods of testing. We still have products on the market with disclaimers because they have not pasted these testing measures. But that's better than false claims and messed up diagnoses, etc.

I was given this test by a psychologist

I recognize psychology as a valid branch of science. However, the Rorschach Test serves as a prime example of how some "professionals" can ruin the credibility of their entire field of study by the actions they take. The Rorschach Test may or may not be a legitimate way of testing for mental health disorders, but without peer review and independent testing it's just an unsupported idea.

I still say Dr Manhattan didnt have to explode him

3:34 Anyone familiar with New Vegas? Classic.

I find this lady very attractive. Now tell me what's going on in my brain when I look at her?

I was given the Rorschach test by a psychologist who DCFS hired when I was 16, she said the results were "inconclusive" and that I was manipulating the test. Turns out I have cptsd and mania with psychosis, so I think maybe the test could be useful as long as the doctor giving it doesn't have presumptions or a bias before giving it :/

To me, the first one looked like two Santas giving a high five. Am I alone with that?