ATM moves to oppose Ramaphosa's impeachment bid

That committee has got x9 anc and x5 DA members more than others

Its the court that will decide not Atm

Constitution allows president to appeal same other persons

Atm is not the law

Why does action sa Herman mashaba not speak why does he use whites or coloured people to do his job ?

But Ramaphosa is no ordinary litigant, he is the president of SA entrusted to protect the constitution. The courts should remind him of that first.

Parliament still need to proof that Ramaphosa his guilty witch is going to be very difficult and Ramaphosa it’s in his right to challenge this it’s in are constitution simple people lack knowledge big time they don’t understand are constitution

Criminal in chief Ramaphosa trying to evade arrest ...the writing is on the wall .mene mene tekel urphasin

The President move will be welcomed by the High Court and will decide to his favor. So far, there is no absolutely no evidence of evidence of misconduct by infringement of the code of conduct and of a crime. These people are hating the President instead of finding material elements. PP, SARB, SARB and the Police, all cleared him. Keeping money in a sofa is not a crime. Fraser said there was torture but there is no record of it in hospital and police. There is no a tortured person. One cannot take the President for impeachment ending in voting, without proven facts. Why are they wanting to impeach Raphosa while they had chance to elect someone else to but DA saved him and ANC by joining them? Now, DA is part of ANC and vice-versa.

The President is completely right. He faces prejudice should the impeachment process goes on, because whether with enough evidence or not the ANC's votes won't be enough to rectify the situation and others will vote to impeach him. Remember that he only paused the appeal as the ANC's votes, then the majority, voted against the impeachment process. Now ANC os noore the majority, despite the fact DA, PA and other in the GNU can still prevent the impeachment. This is a significant risk of prejudice to the President. Furthermore, the panel report had no evidence against the President. The report refers that there is questions the President must ask. This is not "prima faque" as many people are saying. The panel says they had no mandate to work more on the investigation. Who to blame? The same MPs who are now pushing for the impeachment, approved useless terms of reference for the panel.

But the constitutional court did clarify that the only way the parliament could hold the process is if the president takes the matter on review. People of the media seem to ignore that fact.

Weeee this so called professor 😂imenemene 😂

Atm 2% in cabinet

May God guide the Judges so that they rule in favour of justice, truth and transparency! The people of South Africa need to know the truth we have been deceived for too long.

Let Ramaposa face impeachment committee if not gilt

But isn't the Constitutional court the highest court in the land and have the final decision that no lower court can overrule.